Kamlakar Keshav Mhatre vs No Anyone — 335/2025

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 8. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 09th March 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHRG140027162025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

08-11-2025

Filing Number

485/2025

Filing Date

11-12-2025

Registration No

335/2025

Registration Date

11-12-2025

Court

Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 8

Petitioner(s)

Kamlakar Keshav Mhatre

Adv. NAIK NEHA ANIL

Mayank Vasant Mhatre

Manthan Vasant Mhatre

Renuka Shantaram Tandel

Janabai Shantaram Gharat

Sangita Moreshvar Patil

Llakshmi Pralhad Patil

Respondent(s)

No Anyone

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran

09-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Compliance

05-03-2026

Compliance

02-03-2026

Compliance

27-02-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed the application and issued a legal heirship certificate to seven applicants (one son, two grandchildren, and four daughters) of the deceased Yamuna Keshav Mhatre under Section VIII of the Bombay Regulations Act, 1827. The court found that the applicants had provided sufficient oral and documentary evidence, including death certificates and identity documents, establishing their status as legal heirs, and since no objections were raised, the certificate was granted to enable them to claim government benefits related to their mother's acquired property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the application and issued a legal heirship certificate to seven applicants (one son, two grandchildren, and four daughters) of the deceased Yamuna Keshav Mhatre under Section VIII of the Bombay Regulations Act, 1827. The court found that the applicants had provided sufficient oral and documentary evidence, including death certificates and identity documents, establishing their status as legal heirs, and since no objections were raised, the certificate was granted to enable them to claim government benefits related to their mother's acquired property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case