Machhindranath Kashinath Gharat vs No Anyone — 325/2025
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 8. Disposed: Uncontested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 23rd April 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHRG140026642025
e-Filing Number
07-11-2025
Filing Number
470/2025
Filing Date
06-12-2025
Registration No
325/2025
Registration Date
06-12-2025
Court
Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Machhindranath Kashinath Gharat
Adv. MHATRE TRUPTI KUNAL
Narayan Kashinath Gharat
Pushpa Pravin Thakur Alias Pushpa Kashinath Gharat
Adv. MHATRE TRUPTI KUNAL
Yamini Mohan Gharat Aliash Yamini Kashinath Gharaat
Adv. MHATRE TRUPTI KUNAL
Respondent(s)
No Anyone
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court partly allowed the application and issued a Heirship Certificate recognizing the four applicants (two sons and two daughters) as legal heirs of deceased Dharmubai Vishwanath Gharat, who died intestate in 1979. The court found their claim unchallenged after public notices and proclamations yielded no objections, and they submitted supporting identity documents. However, the court explicitly noted that the certificate merely recognizes heir status and does not determine property rights, declining to mention specific properties due to discrepancies in their descriptions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court partly allowed the application and issued a Heirship Certificate recognizing the four applicants (two sons and two daughters) as legal heirs of deceased Dharmubai Vishwanath Gharat, who died intestate in 1979. The court found their claim unchallenged after public notices and proclamations yielded no objections, and they submitted supporting identity documents. However, the court explicitly noted that the certificate merely recognizes heir status and does not determine property rights, declining to mention specific properties due to discrepancies in their descriptions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts