Omprasad Hrishchandra Padte vs No Anyone — 347/2024

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 8. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 09th April 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHRG140025872024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

520/2024

Filing Date

16-12-2024

Registration No

347/2024

Registration Date

16-12-2024

Court

Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran

Judge

4-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran

Decision Date

09th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 8

Petitioner(s)

Omprasad Hrishchandra Padte

Adv. Neha Naik

Bhagayashri Anant Darne

Pranali Pravin Mhatre

Seema Santosh Mhatre

Respondent(s)

No Anyone

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran

09-04-2026

Disposed

01-04-2026

Order

30-03-2026

Order

25-03-2026

Arguments

20-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

09-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court granted the application and issued a legal heirship certificate to all four applicants (Omprasad Harishchandra Padte and his three sisters) as the sole legal heirs of their deceased father, Harishchandra Shantaram Padte, based on their affidavits, death certificates, and other documentary evidence. The court found the application uncontested and established that the applicants are entitled to claim government benefits for land acquired by CIDCO in their deceased father's village. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the application and issued a legal heirship certificate to all four applicants (Omprasad Harishchandra Padte and his three sisters) as the sole legal heirs of their deceased father, Harishchandra Shantaram Padte, based on their affidavits, death certificates, and other documentary evidence. The court found the application uncontested and established that the applicants are entitled to claim government benefits for land acquired by CIDCO in their deceased father's village. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case