State of Maharashtra Through Uran Police Station vs Subhash Shankar Chakravarti — 121/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 106(1),125(a),125(b),281. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG140025592025

Case disposed

Filing Number

2149/2025

Filing Date

17-10-2025

Registration No

121/2025

Registration Date

17-10-2025

Court

Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

141

Police Station

Uran Police station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 106(1),125(a),125(b),281
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section 184

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Through Uran Police Station

Respondent(s)

Subhash Shankar Chakravarti

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Evidence

27-02-2026

N.B.W._Unready

06-02-2026

Awaiting Summons

23-01-2026

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: 121/2025 Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate in Uran acquitted Subhash Shankar Chakravarti of all charges under IPC Sections 106(1), 125(a), 125(b), 281, and Motor Vehicles Act Section 184. The court found the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole eyewitness (the accused's wife) could not corroborate the charges, and no independent evidence supported the allegations of rash driving or causing death. Key Outcome: The accused was granted complete acquittal and released on bail with a personal bond of ₹15,000. The case stemmed from an alleged traffic incident on May 21, 2025, but evidentiary gaps resulted in discharge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 121/2025 Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate in Uran acquitted Subhash Shankar Chakravarti of all charges under IPC Sections 106(1), 125(a), 125(b), 281, and Motor Vehicles Act Section 184. The court found the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole eyewitness (the accused's wife) could not corroborate the charges, and no independent evidence supported the allegations of rash driving or causing death. Key Outcome: The accused was granted complete acquittal and released on bail with a personal bond of ₹15,000. The case stemmed from an alleged traffic incident on May 21, 2025, but evidentiary gaps resulted in discharge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case