State of Maharashtra Through Uran Police Station vs Subhash Shankar Chakravarti — 121/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 106(1),125(a),125(b),281. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG140025592025
Filing Number
2149/2025
Filing Date
17-10-2025
Registration No
121/2025
Registration Date
17-10-2025
Court
Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
141
Police Station
Uran Police station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Uran Police Station
Respondent(s)
Subhash Shankar Chakravarti
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran
Disposed
Evidence
N.B.W._Unready
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-02-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 06-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 23-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 121/2025 Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate in Uran acquitted Subhash Shankar Chakravarti of all charges under IPC Sections 106(1), 125(a), 125(b), 281, and Motor Vehicles Act Section 184. The court found the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole eyewitness (the accused's wife) could not corroborate the charges, and no independent evidence supported the allegations of rash driving or causing death. Key Outcome: The accused was granted complete acquittal and released on bail with a personal bond of ₹15,000. The case stemmed from an alleged traffic incident on May 21, 2025, but evidentiary gaps resulted in discharge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 121/2025 Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate in Uran acquitted Subhash Shankar Chakravarti of all charges under IPC Sections 106(1), 125(a), 125(b), 281, and Motor Vehicles Act Section 184. The court found the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole eyewitness (the accused's wife) could not corroborate the charges, and no independent evidence supported the allegations of rash driving or causing death. Key Outcome: The accused was granted complete acquittal and released on bail with a personal bond of ₹15,000. The case stemmed from an alleged traffic incident on May 21, 2025, but evidentiary gaps resulted in discharge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts