Manjula Ramdas Mhatre And 4 vs No Anyone — 245/2025
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 20th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHRG140024152025
e-Filing Number
29-08-2025
Filing Number
359/2025
Filing Date
11-09-2025
Registration No
245/2025
Registration Date
11-09-2025
Court
Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran
Judge
4-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manjula Ramdas Mhatre And 4
Adv. MANE SUVARNALATA MARUTI
Mahesh Ramdas Mhatre
Sandhya Deepak Patil
Smita Navnit Taware
Shital Jayesh Bhoir
Respondent(s)
No Anyone
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran
Disposed
Order
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Order |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 28-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Civil M.A. No. 245/2025 The court allowed the application and issued legal heirship certificates to five applicants under the Bombay Regulations Act, 1827. The applicants—widow Manjula Ramdas Mhatre, son Mahesh Ramdas Mhatre, and daughters Sandhya, Smita, and Shital—were recognized as the sole legal heirs of deceased Ramdas Raghunath Mhatre (died 16.05.2022). The court found their oral and documentary evidence, including death certificates and identity documents, sufficient and unopposed to establish their heirship status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Civil M.A. No. 245/2025 The court allowed the application and issued legal heirship certificates to five applicants under the Bombay Regulations Act, 1827. The applicants—widow Manjula Ramdas Mhatre, son Mahesh Ramdas Mhatre, and daughters Sandhya, Smita, and Shital—were recognized as the sole legal heirs of deceased Ramdas Raghunath Mhatre (died 16.05.2022). The court found their oral and documentary evidence, including death certificates and identity documents, sufficient and unopposed to establish their heirship status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts