Krushna Ganpat Koli vs Nirmala Gopinath Patil Advocate - Shehjad Pathan — 175/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Report. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG140022372023
Next Hearing
13th April 2026
e-Filing Number
25-10-2023
Filing Number
406/2023
Filing Date
29-11-2023
Registration No
175/2023
Registration Date
29-11-2023
Court
Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran
Judge
4-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Krushna Ganpat Koli
Adv. Hrudaynath Mhatre
Gajanan Manglya Koli
Sachin Manglya Koli
Respondent(s)
Nirmala Gopinath Patil Advocate - Shehjad Pathan
Gangabai Raman Patil
Manohar Raman Patil
Sandhya Dnyaneshwar Koli
Nanda Rajesh Koli
Nirmala Kishor Koli
Bebibai Narhari Patil
Tulashibai Dhavu Patil
Shakuntala Narayan Koli
Harjindar Guruvaksh Singh
Kulwindar Kaur Harjindar Kaur
Vyomesh Mahipatrai Shah
Sanju Shesherao Tambhale
Santosh Vishnupant Kulkarni
Prashant Ramesh Bhoyarekar
Govinda Tukaram Sarje
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran
Report
Report
Report
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Report | |
| 09-03-2026 | Report | |
| 13-02-2026 | Report | |
| 20-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 16-01-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Summary The court rejected both applications filed by defendants under Order VII Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of the plaint. The plaintiff's suit for partition of ancestral properties, cancellation of a 1997 Will, and nullification of subsequent sale deeds will proceed to trial, as the court found the limitation bar and other defects were not apparent on the face of the plaint and involved disputed questions of fact requiring adjudication on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court rejected both applications filed by defendants under Order VII Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of the plaint. The plaintiff's suit for partition of ancestral properties, cancellation of a 1997 Will, and nullification of subsequent sale deeds will proceed to trial, as the court found the limitation bar and other defects were not apparent on the face of the plaint and involved disputed questions of fact requiring adjudication on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts