Tulsa Hasuram Tandel@Tulsa Bhiva Thakur vs Kiran Raghunath Thakur — 149/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 30-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHRG140020542024

Filing Number

483/2024

Filing Date

28-Nov-2024

Registration No

149/2024

Registration Date

28-Nov-2024

Court

Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Tulsa Hasuram Tandel@Tulsa Bhiva Thakur

    Adv. Paresh Bhoir

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kiran Raghunath Thakur

  2. 2.Anusaya Raghunath Thakur

  3. 3.Parubai Shankar Mhatre

  4. 4.Vandana Surendra Bhoir

  5. 5.Damabai Kailas Bhoir

  6. 6.Surekha Gajanan Thakur

  7. 7.Prasad Gajanan Thakur

  8. 8.Ratnamala @ Ratan Vishwanath Thakur

  9. 9.Pavitra @ Mai Nilesh Patil

  10. 10.Jagdish Namdev Thakur

  11. 11.Sugandha @ Jaywanti Dhananjay Patil

  12. 12.Hira Dinesh Mhatre

  13. 13.Kalavati Namdev Thakur

  14. 14.Yuvraj Ganpat Mhatre

  15. 15.Amrut Ganpat Mhatre

  16. 16.Pratiksha Dinesh Patil

Case History

  1. 30-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Order Summary Case: Tulsa Hasuram Tandel v. Kiran Raghunath Thakur and Others (RCS No. 149/2024) Court: 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Uran Date: 10.03.2026 Outcome: The application filed by defendants 1-5 to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC on grounds of limitation and being barred by law is rejected. The court found that limitation is a mixed question of fact and law requiring evidence, and the plaintiff's claim that she obtained knowledge of the relevant mutation entry in 2024 brings the suit within the prescribed period. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  8. 22-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  9. 14-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  10. 22-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  11. 25-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  12. 03-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  13. 07-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  14. 11-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  15. 07-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  16. 09-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  17. 30-Apr-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran

  18. 25-Mar-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran

  19. 06-Feb-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran

  20. 20-Dec-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran

  21. 29-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 28-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 149/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Order Summary Case: Tulsa Hasuram Tandel v. Kiran Raghunath Thakur and Others (RCS No. 149/2024) Court: 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Uran Date: 10.03.2026 Outcome: The application filed by defendants 1-5 to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC on grounds of limitation and being barred by law is rejected. The court found that limitation is a mixed question of fact and law requiring evidence, and the plaintiff's claim that she obtained knowledge of the relevant mutation entry in 2024 brings the suit within the prescribed period. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case