Yasamin Hasan patel And 4 vs No Anyone — 231/2025

Case under Bombay Reorganisation Act Section 8. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHRG140017132025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

04-08-2025

Filing Number

328/2025

Filing Date

11-08-2025

Registration No

231/2025

Registration Date

11-08-2025

Court

Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bombay Reorganisation Act Section 8

Petitioner(s)

Yasamin Hasan patel And 4

Adv. MHATRE SHUBHANGI SAPREM

Fazal Mehamood mohhamad Hasan Patel

Faisal Abul Hamid Patel

Mufssir Abdul Hamid Patel

Sabhin Alias Sabin Intikhab Chaugale Alias Sabhin Abdul Hamid Patel

Respondent(s)

No Anyone

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran

13-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Arguments

06-03-2026

Compliance

02-03-2026

Compliance

27-02-2026

Compliance

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed the application for issuance of a legal heirship certificate under the Bombay Regulations Act, 1827. The five applicants (daughter, son, and three grandchildren of deceased Zohrabibi @ Zohra Mohammed Hasan Patel, who died in 2006) established their heirship through affidavits, death certificates, and identity documents; since the application remained uncontested and oral/documentary evidence conclusively proved their status as legal heirs, the court directed issuance of the heirship certificate to enable them to claim benefits from government land acquisition compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the application for issuance of a legal heirship certificate under the Bombay Regulations Act, 1827. The five applicants (daughter, son, and three grandchildren of deceased Zohrabibi @ Zohra Mohammed Hasan Patel, who died in 2006) established their heirship through affidavits, death certificates, and identity documents; since the application remained uncontested and oral/documentary evidence conclusively proved their status as legal heirs, the court directed issuance of the heirship certificate to enable them to claim benefits from government land acquisition compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case