State of Maharashtra Through Uran Police Station vs Anarul Jafar Ali — 628/2024

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Act, 1988 Section 8c,27. Disposed: Contested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG140010952024

Filing Number

797/2024

Filing Date

02-Jul-2024

Registration No

628/2024

Registration Date

02-Jul-2024

Court

Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran

Judge

4-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

207

Police Station

Poynad Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Act, 1988 Section 8c,27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through Uran Police Station

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Anarul Jafar Ali

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case 628/2024 Summary The First Class Magistrate's court in Uran acquitted respondent Anarul Jafar Ali of charges under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act 1985, Sections 8(c) and 27, due to fatal deficiencies in the prosecution's evidence and chain of custody. The court found that critical physical evidence (seized contraband) was destroyed without proper documentation, no chemical analysis report was submitted, and the investigation relied on "stock witnesses" rather than credible testimony, rendering the case wholly insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  8. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  9. 31-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  10. 16-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  11. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  12. 12-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  13. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  14. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  15. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  16. 26-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  17. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  18. 14-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  19. 13-May-2025

    Filing of Surety

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  20. 24-Mar-2025

    Filing of Surety

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  21. 10-Feb-2025

    Filing of Surety

  22. 06-Jan-2025

    Filing of Surety

  23. 05-Dec-2024

    Filing of Surety

  24. 22-Oct-2024

    Filing of Surety

  25. 09-Sep-2024

    Filing of Surety

  26. 05-Aug-2024

    Filing of Surety

  27. 03-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 02-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 628/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 628/2024 Summary The First Class Magistrate's court in Uran acquitted respondent Anarul Jafar Ali of charges under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act 1985, Sections 8(c) and 27, due to fatal deficiencies in the prosecution's evidence and chain of custody. The court found that critical physical evidence (seized contraband) was destroyed without proper documentation, no chemical analysis report was submitted, and the investigation relied on "stock witnesses" rather than credible testimony, rendering the case wholly insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case