Labour Enforcement Officer Rohini Jadhav vs Farhan Azmi Advocate - Gawand Keval M. — 775/2025
Case under Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Central Rules Section 24. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG140010312025
e-Filing Number
20-04-2025
Filing Number
863/2025
Filing Date
28-Apr-2025
Registration No
775/2025
Registration Date
28-Apr-2025
Court
Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran
Judge
4-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Labour Enforcement Officer Rohini Jadhav
Adv. Central Labour Department
Respondent(s)
-
1.Farhan Azmi Advocate - Gawand Keval M.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court convicted the respondent Farhan Azmi for violating the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act by failing to maintain proper records and documentation as required under Rule 82/1 and other provisions. The respondent was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000 (with 8 days simple imprisonment as default) and directed to provide a free copy of the judgment to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
08-Jan-2026
Filing of Surety
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
13-Nov-2025
B.W._Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
16-Oct-2025
B.W._Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
10-Oct-2025
Order on Exh
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
26-Aug-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
07-Jul-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
10-May-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran
-
29-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 775/2025
The court convicted the respondent Farhan Azmi for violating the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act by failing to maintain proper records and documentation as required under Rule 82/1 and other provisions. The respondent was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000 (with 8 days simple imprisonment as default) and directed to provide a free copy of the judgment to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts