State Through Ganesh Babudas Adhikari vs Prasad Satish Pandit Advocate - Gangan Y. J. — 190/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 435,427. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG140010302022
Filing Number
747/2022
Filing Date
12-Sep-2022
Registration No
190/2022
Registration Date
12-Sep-2022
Court
Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran
Judge
4-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
26
Police Station
Pen Police Station
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Through Ganesh Babudas Adhikari
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Prasad Satish Pandit Advocate - Gangan Y. J.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: RCC No-190/2022 (State v. Prasad Satish Pandit) Court Decision: The accused, Prasad Satish Pandit, was acquitted of charges under Sections 435 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code (burning property and mischief causing damage). The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt—no witness saw the accused commit the act, and the alleged Section 27 discovery evidence was deemed legally invalid since police had already visited the incident spot months earlier. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
12-Mar-2026
Arguments
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
25-Feb-2026
Arguments
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
23-Feb-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
23-Feb-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
23-Feb-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
02-Feb-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
02-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
22-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
24-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
04-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
14-Aug-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
12-Jun-2025
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
07-Apr-2025
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
10-Mar-2025
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
06-Feb-2025
Hearing
-
18-Jan-2025
Hearing
-
12-Dec-2024
Hearing
-
19-Nov-2024
Hearing
-
04-Nov-2024
Hearing
-
23-Sep-2024
Hearing
-
13-Aug-2024
Hearing
-
08-May-2024
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
17-Feb-2024
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
12-Dec-2023
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
16-Oct-2023
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
24-Jul-2023
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
22-Jun-2023
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
16-Mar-2023
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
18-Jan-2023
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
29-Nov-2022
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
29-Sep-2022
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
13-Sep-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Sep-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 190/2022
Case Summary: RCC No-190/2022 (State v. Prasad Satish Pandit) Court Decision: The accused, Prasad Satish Pandit, was acquitted of charges under Sections 435 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code (burning property and mischief causing damage). The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt—no witness saw the accused commit the act, and the alleged Section 27 discovery evidence was deemed legally invalid since police had already visited the incident spot months earlier. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts