State of Maharashtra Through Nhava Sheva Police Station vs Vishwas Ramesh Shivkar Advocate - Naik N.H. — 721/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 189(2),126(2). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 04-Jun-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG140009222025

Filing Number

795/2025

Filing Date

07-Apr-2025

Registration No

721/2025

Registration Date

07-Apr-2025

Court

Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran

Judge

4-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

135

Police Station

Poynad Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 189(2),126(2)
Maharashtra Police Act Section 37(1),135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through Nhava Sheva Police Station

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vishwas Ramesh Shivkar Advocate - Naik N.H.

  2. 2.Kishor Madhukar Thakur

  3. 3.Prashant Tanaji Shedage

  4. 4.Naresh (Narendra) Gajanan Patil

  5. 5.Hiraji Maruti Thakur

  6. 6.Dnyaneshwar Dashrath Gharat

  7. 7.Nandakumar Ganesh Gawand

  8. 8.Sushil Hiraji Thakur

  9. 9.Rajendra Namdev Thakur

  10. 10.Chandrashekhar Laxman Mokal

  11. 11.Dipak Dhavaji Mokal

  12. 12.Priyanka Samadhn Patil ( Thakur)

  13. 13.Vilas Krushna Thakur

  14. 14.Sanjay Aatmaram Thakur

Case History

  1. 04-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

    Case Summary: 721/2025 Outcome: Cross-examination of prosecution witness (Police Naik) completed; examination-in-chief and cross-examination concluded on 07/05/2026. This case involves charges related to a traffic accident on 07/08/2024 where a trailer collided with an autorickshaw near GTY Company, Nhava Sheva, resulting in the autorickshaw driver's death and an employee's injury. The prosecution witness testified about subsequent events where relatives of the deceased gathered at Nhava Sheva Police Station demanding custody of the body, then assembled at a pre-gate area toward JNPT, causing a traffic obstruction from 2:00 PM to 4:00 PM with approximately 40 people present. The witness detailed serving dispersal orders and taking action against the protestors. The defense cross-examination extensively challenged the witness's account regarding the assembly, traffic obstruction, and circumstances surrounding the police response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  7. 14-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  8. 17-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  9. 19-Nov-2025

    PleaView PDF

  10. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  11. 08-Oct-2025

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  12. 20-Aug-2025

    Documents

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  13. 26-Jun-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  14. 09-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 07-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 721/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 721/2025 Outcome: Cross-examination of prosecution witness (Police Naik) completed; examination-in-chief and cross-examination concluded on 07/05/2026. This case involves charges related to a traffic accident on 07/08/2024 where a trailer collided with an autorickshaw near GTY Company, Nhava Sheva, resulting in the autorickshaw driver's death and an employee's injury. The prosecution witness testified about subsequent events where relatives of the deceased gathered at Nhava Sheva Police Station demanding custody of the body, then assembled at a pre-gate area toward JNPT, causing a traffic obstruction from 2:00 PM to 4:00 PM with approximately 40 people present. The witness detailed serving dispersal orders and taking action against the protestors. The defense cross-examination extensively challenged the witness's account regarding the assembly, traffic obstruction, and circumstances surrounding the police response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case