Prakash Dadu Nakhawa vs Balkrishna Dhanaji Patil — 126/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Dismissal Order. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG140009032023
Filing Number
247/2023
Filing Date
13-Jul-2023
Registration No
126/2023
Registration Date
13-Jul-2023
Court
Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Prakash Dadu Nakhawa
Adv. Yogesh Bapardekar
-
2.Shrikant Pathak
-
3.Devanand Taneja
-
4.Harisingh Narasingh Sadana
-
5.Dilip Hasuram Mumbaikar
-
6.Ghanashyam Hasuram Mumbaikar
-
7.Rajendra Hasuram Mumbaikar
-
8.Prakash Damodar Kadu
Respondent(s)
-
1.Balkrishna Dhanaji Patil
-
2.Mahadev Waman Banda
-
3.Kishor Chandrakant Gharat
-
4.Chief Officer, Uran Nagarparishad
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Apr-2026
Dismissal Order
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
12-Mar-2026
Dismissal Order
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
31-Jan-2026
Dismissal Order
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
11-Dec-2025
Dismissal Order
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
12-Nov-2025
Dismissal Order
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
24-Sep-2025
Dismissal Order
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
19-Aug-2025
Dismissal Order
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
28-Jul-2025
Dismissal Order
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
21-Jun-2025
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
16-Apr-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran
-
17-Mar-2025
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
27-Jan-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran
-
02-Dec-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran
-
25-Oct-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran
-
09-Sep-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran
-
27-Jul-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran
-
10-Jun-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran
-
03-Mar-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran
-
16-Jan-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran
-
27-Nov-2023
Hearing
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran
-
25-Sep-2023
Hearing
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran
-
17-Aug-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: RCS 126/2023 Outcome: Application for temporary injunction REJECTED. The court rejected petitioners' application seeking to restrain defendants from evicting them from a property in Kotnaka, Uran, Raigad. Petitioners, who claimed 37 years tenancy, argued defendants were evicting them without due process. However, the court found petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case since: (1) the property's dilapidated condition was confirmed by Visual Inspection Report and petitioners' own letters; (2) the municipal authority properly issued demolition notice under law; and (3) petitioners did not challenge the notices' legality. Consequently, no injunction was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Aug-2023
Hearing
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran
-
09-Aug-2023
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran
-
02-Aug-2023
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran
-
25-Jul-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
25-Jul-2023
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran
-
20-Jul-2023
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran
-
13-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 126/2023
Case Summary: RCS 126/2023 Outcome: Application for temporary injunction REJECTED. The court rejected petitioners' application seeking to restrain defendants from evicting them from a property in Kotnaka, Uran, Raigad. Petitioners, who claimed 37 years tenancy, argued defendants were evicting them without due process. However, the court found petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case since: (1) the property's dilapidated condition was confirmed by Visual Inspection Report and petitioners' own letters; (2) the municipal authority properly issued demolition notice under law; and (3) petitioners did not challenge the notices' legality. Consequently, no injunction was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts