Pritam Arvind Gharat vs Harjivan Laxman Mhatre Advocate - mhatre p.b. — 75/2023

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section VIII. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHRG140005572023

Filing Number

170/2023

Filing Date

27-Apr-2023

Registration No

75/2023

Registration Date

27-Apr-2023

Court

Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section VIII

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pritam Arvind Gharat

    Adv. Patil Ratnadeep R.

  2. 2.Rakesh Arvind Gharat

  3. 3.Pragati Vaibhav Mhatre @ Pragati Arvind Gharat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Harjivan Laxman Mhatre Advocate - mhatre p.b.

  2. 2.Vandana Shantaram Mhatre

  3. 3.Sunil Laxman Mhatre

  4. 4.Shalini Arvind Gharat

  5. 5.Mahendra Laxman Mhatre

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    In CMA No.75/2023, the court allowed the applicants' withdrawal petition without imposing costs, finding no loss would be caused to the non-applicants and sufficient grounds existed for withdrawal. The application was disposed of as withdrawn, with court fees to be refunded as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  5. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  7. 20-Dec-2025

    Amended Plaint

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  8. 19-Nov-2025

    Amended Plaint

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  9. 28-Oct-2025

    Steps

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  10. 27-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  11. 19-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  12. 08-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  13. 05-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  14. 02-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  15. 31-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  16. 25-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  17. 15-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  18. 09-May-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran

  19. 19-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran

  20. 06-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran

  21. 07-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran

  22. 22-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran

  23. 10-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran

  24. 06-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran

  25. 14-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran

  26. 19-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran

  27. 11-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  28. 11-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  29. 11-Oct-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  30. 17-Aug-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  31. 22-Jun-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

  32. 28-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 27-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 75/2023

casestatus.in Summary

In CMA No.75/2023, the court allowed the applicants' withdrawal petition without imposing costs, finding no loss would be caused to the non-applicants and sufficient grounds existed for withdrawal. The application was disposed of as withdrawn, with court fees to be refunded as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case