State Through Amit Narendra Shinde vs Harish Gunvantray Davda Advocate - Gangan Y. J. — 107/2021
Case under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act,1966 Section 6,53,53(7). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG140004432021
Filing Number
249/2021
Filing Date
25-Mar-2021
Registration No
107/2021
Registration Date
25-Mar-2021
Court
Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran
Judge
4-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
423
Police Station
Uran Police station
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Through Amit Narendra Shinde
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Harish Gunvantray Davda Advocate - Gangan Y. J.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The court acquitted Harish Gunvantrai Davda of charges under Section 53(7) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, for unauthorized construction. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove valid service of the statutory notice, as it was received by an unconnected third party (Alim Shaikh) whose relationship to the accused was never established, coupled with defective investigation and jurisdictional issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
26-Feb-2026
Judgment
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
24-Feb-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
06-Jan-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
01-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
06-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
17-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
07-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
19-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
19-Jun-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
17-Apr-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
13-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
13-Feb-2025
Evidence Part Heard
-
07-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
-
21-Nov-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
23-Oct-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
19-Sep-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
09-Aug-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
20-Jul-2024
Hearing
-
06-Apr-2024
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
25-Jan-2024
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
21-Nov-2023
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
04-Sep-2023
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
22-Jun-2023
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
12-Apr-2023
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
08-Feb-2023
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
14-Dec-2022
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
10-Oct-2022
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
03-Oct-2022
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
10-Aug-2022
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
11-Jul-2022
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
25-May-2022
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
28-Mar-2022
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
25-Feb-2022
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
27-Jan-2022
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
29-Nov-2021
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
22-Sep-2021
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
28-Jul-2021
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
29-Jun-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Mar-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 107/2021
Summary The court acquitted Harish Gunvantrai Davda of charges under Section 53(7) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, for unauthorized construction. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove valid service of the statutory notice, as it was received by an unconnected third party (Alim Shaikh) whose relationship to the accused was never established, coupled with defective investigation and jurisdictional issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts