State Through Amit Narendra Shinde vs Harish Gunvantray Davda Advocate - Gangan Y. J. — 107/2021
Case under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act,1966 Section 6,53,53(7). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG140004432021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
249/2021
Filing Date
25-03-2021
Registration No
107/2021
Registration Date
25-03-2021
Court
Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran
Judge
4-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
423
Police Station
Uran Police station
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Through Amit Narendra Shinde
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Harish Gunvantray Davda Advocate - Gangan Y. J.
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
Disposed
Judgment
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 26-02-2026 | Judgment | |
| 24-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 27-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 06-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted Harish Gunvantrai Davda of charges under Section 53(7) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, for unauthorized construction. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove valid service of the statutory notice, as it was received by an unconnected third party (Alim Shaikh) whose relationship to the accused was never established, coupled with defective investigation and jurisdictional issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court acquitted Harish Gunvantrai Davda of charges under Section 53(7) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, for unauthorized construction. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove valid service of the statutory notice, as it was received by an unconnected third party (Alim Shaikh) whose relationship to the accused was never established, coupled with defective investigation and jurisdictional issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts