Hind Terminals Pvt Ltd through Mr Afan Kapde vs Hiraji Barka Thakur — 29/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 39 Rule 1. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHRG140002702026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Next Hearing

27th April 2026

e-Filing Number

07-03-2026

Filing Number

115/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

29/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section Order 39 Rule 1

Petitioner(s)

Hind Terminals Pvt Ltd through Mr Afan Kapde

Adv. BHANUSHALI RAJENDRA SURYAKANT

Respondent(s)

Hiraji Barka Thakur

Bhaskar Masani Mokal

Santosh Hiraji Thakur

Sushant Sudhir Patil

Suresh Gajanan Patil

Alankar Ankush Pardeshi

Kalambhusare Shetkari Samajik sevabhavi Sanstha through Vikrant Patil

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

09-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

07-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

Interim Orders

09-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court partly allowed Hind Terminals Pvt Ltd's interim injunction application against defendants seeking to restrict demonstrations near their Container Freight Station at Uran. The court found a prima facie case, balance of convenience in plaintiff's favor, and irreparable loss risk. However, the injunction was moderated to restrain demonstrations only on the company's public roadside, premises, and road—preserving defendants' right to hold peaceful protests elsewhere without obstructing cargo movement or causing property damage, balancing both parties' rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court partly allowed Hind Terminals Pvt Ltd's interim injunction application against defendants seeking to restrict demonstrations near their Container Freight Station at Uran. The court found a prima facie case, balance of convenience in plaintiff's favor, and irreparable loss risk. However, the injunction was moderated to restrain demonstrations only on the company's public roadside, premises, and road—preserving defendants' right to hold peaceful protests elsewhere without obstructing cargo movement or causing property damage, balancing both parties' rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case