Hind Terminals Pvt Ltd through Mr Afan Kapde vs Hiraji Barka Thakur — 29/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 39 Rule 1. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready Next hearing 27-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHRG140002702026

e-Filing Number

07-03-2026

Filing Number

115/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

29/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 39 Rule 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hind Terminals Pvt Ltd through Mr Afan Kapde

    Adv. BHANUSHALI RAJENDRA SURYAKANT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Hiraji Barka Thakur

  2. 2.Bhaskar Masani Mokal

  3. 3.Santosh Hiraji Thakur

  4. 4.Sushant Sudhir Patil

  5. 5.Suresh Gajanan Patil

  6. 6.Alankar Ankush Pardeshi

  7. 7.Kalambhusare Shetkari Samajik sevabhavi Sanstha through Vikrant Patil

Case History

  1. 27-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court partly allowed Hind Terminals Pvt Ltd's interim injunction application against defendants seeking to restrict demonstrations near their Container Freight Station at Uran. The court found a prima facie case, balance of convenience in plaintiff's favor, and irreparable loss risk. However, the injunction was moderated to restrain demonstrations only on the company's public roadside, premises, and road—preserving defendants' right to hold peaceful protests elsewhere without obstructing cargo movement or causing property damage, balancing both parties' rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 29/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court partly allowed Hind Terminals Pvt Ltd's interim injunction application against defendants seeking to restrict demonstrations near their Container Freight Station at Uran. The court found a prima facie case, balance of convenience in plaintiff's favor, and irreparable loss risk. However, the injunction was moderated to restrain demonstrations only on the company's public roadside, premises, and road—preserving defendants' right to hold peaceful protests elsewhere without obstructing cargo movement or causing property damage, balancing both parties' rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case