Hind Terminals Pvt Ltd through Mr Afan Kapde vs Hiraji Barka Thakur — 29/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 39 Rule 1. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG140002702026
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
115/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
29/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hind Terminals Pvt Ltd through Mr Afan Kapde
Adv. BHANUSHALI RAJENDRA SURYAKANT
Respondent(s)
Hiraji Barka Thakur
Bhaskar Masani Mokal
Santosh Hiraji Thakur
Sushant Sudhir Patil
Suresh Gajanan Patil
Alankar Ankush Pardeshi
Kalambhusare Shetkari Samajik sevabhavi Sanstha through Vikrant Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 07-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court partly allowed Hind Terminals Pvt Ltd's interim injunction application against defendants seeking to restrict demonstrations near their Container Freight Station at Uran. The court found a prima facie case, balance of convenience in plaintiff's favor, and irreparable loss risk. However, the injunction was moderated to restrain demonstrations only on the company's public roadside, premises, and road—preserving defendants' right to hold peaceful protests elsewhere without obstructing cargo movement or causing property damage, balancing both parties' rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court partly allowed Hind Terminals Pvt Ltd's interim injunction application against defendants seeking to restrict demonstrations near their Container Freight Station at Uran. The court found a prima facie case, balance of convenience in plaintiff's favor, and irreparable loss risk. However, the injunction was moderated to restrain demonstrations only on the company's public roadside, premises, and road—preserving defendants' right to hold peaceful protests elsewhere without obstructing cargo movement or causing property damage, balancing both parties' rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts