Vishal Dhananjay Thakur vs Vijendra Vijay Gawand — 16/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHRG140002512026

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

164/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

16/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vishal Dhananjay Thakur

    Adv. Abhishek Dattatrey Mhatre

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vijendra Vijay Gawand

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court partially allowed the applicant's Section 503 BNSS application to recover seized gold jewelry (17.690 grams nugget and 300 milligrams nosering), finding the applicant was the lawful owner based on bills and the investigating officer's acknowledgment that the accused had melted the stolen ornaments. The court granted custody to the applicant subject to executing a ₹2,50,000 bond and required photographic documentation before trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 16/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court partially allowed the applicant's Section 503 BNSS application to recover seized gold jewelry (17.690 grams nugget and 300 milligrams nosering), finding the applicant was the lawful owner based on bills and the investigating officer's acknowledgment that the accused had melted the stolen ornaments. The court granted custody to the applicant subject to executing a ₹2,50,000 bond and required photographic documentation before trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case