Harshali Ratnakar Parve vs Mhatrash State For Nhavasheva Police Station — 15/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 06th April 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHRG140002502026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

163/2026

Filing Date

04-03-2026

Registration No

15/2026

Registration Date

04-03-2026

Court

Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

Decision Date

06th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

Police Station

Alibag Police Station

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Harshali Ratnakar Parve

Adv. KATARNE JITENDRA GANADHISH

Respondent(s)

Mhatrash State For Nhavasheva Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.

06-04-2026

Disposed

04-04-2026

Arguments

31-03-2026

Arguments

30-03-2026

Arguments

25-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

06-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court granted Harshali Ratnakar Parve's application for release of seized gold items (totaling approximately 173 grams) from police custody, finding no purpose served by keeping valuables lying unattended at the police station with risk of damage. The applicant was granted interim custody until trial conclusion upon executing a ₹5,00,000 indemnity bond and undertaking not to sell or transfer the items, with conditions requiring production when needed and maintenance of detailed records by the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted Harshali Ratnakar Parve's application for release of seized gold items (totaling approximately 173 grams) from police custody, finding no purpose served by keeping valuables lying unattended at the police station with risk of damage. The applicant was granted interim custody until trial conclusion upon executing a ₹5,00,000 indemnity bond and undertaking not to sell or transfer the items, with conditions requiring production when needed and maintenance of detailed records by the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case