Jatappa Yamanappa Yergal vs Ganesh Shankar Kondilka — 88/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 18th July 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG140002072026
e-Filing Number
18-02-2026
Filing Number
138/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
88/2026
Registration Date
18-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jatappa Yamanappa Yergal
Adv. Patil Amar C.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ganesh Shankar Kondilka
Case History
-
18-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
-
13-Apr-2026
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
12-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran
-
24-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 88/2026 Summary: The court found a prima-facie case against the accused (Ganesh Shankar Kondilka) for an offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act based on the complainant's (Jatappa Yamanappa Yergal) complaint and supporting documents. Process was issued against the accused under Section 227 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, allowing the case to proceed to trial where both parties will have the opportunity to present their evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Feb-2026
Verification
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran
-
20-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 88/2026
Case 88/2026 Summary: The court found a prima-facie case against the accused (Ganesh Shankar Kondilka) for an offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act based on the complainant's (Jatappa Yamanappa Yergal) complaint and supporting documents. Process was issued against the accused under Section 227 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, allowing the case to proceed to trial where both parties will have the opportunity to present their evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts