State of Maharashtra Through Uran Police Station vs Vijendra Vijay Gawand — 1/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4),305. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG140000012026
Filing Number
1/2026
Filing Date
01-01-2026
Registration No
1/2026
Registration Date
01-01-2026
Court
Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
241
Police Station
Uran Police station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Uran Police Station
Respondent(s)
Vijendra Vijay Gawand
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran
Disposed
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Production of Accused |
| 11-03-2026 | Production of Accused |
| 26-02-2026 | Production of Accused |
| 12-02-2026 | Production of Accused |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 1/2026 - State of Maharashtra v. Vijendra Vijay Gawand The court acquitted respondent Vijendra Vijay Gawand of charges under IPC Sections 331(4) and 305, finding that the prosecution failed to establish the alleged crimes beyond reasonable doubt. The police had charged Gawand with unauthorized home entry and theft of contraband items (approximately ₹2,59,000 worth of liquor and a gas cylinder) from the complainant's residence in September 2025, but the court determined the prosecution's evidence—primarily witness testimony—lacked credibility and corroboration. Consequently, the court ordered Gawand's release and directed return of seized property to the original owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 1/2026 - State of Maharashtra v. Vijendra Vijay Gawand The court acquitted respondent Vijendra Vijay Gawand of charges under IPC Sections 331(4) and 305, finding that the prosecution failed to establish the alleged crimes beyond reasonable doubt. The police had charged Gawand with unauthorized home entry and theft of contraband items (approximately ₹2,59,000 worth of liquor and a gas cylinder) from the complainant's residence in September 2025, but the court determined the prosecution's evidence—primarily witness testimony—lacked credibility and corroboration. Consequently, the court ordered Gawand's release and directed return of seized property to the original owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts