State - Shriwardhan P. S. vs Suraj Rajesh Gandre — 106/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74,. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG130007362025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
624/2025
Filing Date
19-12-2025
Registration No
106/2025
Registration Date
19-12-2025
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
81
Police Station
Shriwardhan
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State - Shriwardhan P. S.
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Suraj Rajesh Gandre
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Disposed
Judgment
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-02-2026 | Judgment | |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate of Shriwardhan acquitted the accused Suraj Rajesh Gandre under Section 74 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, finding insufficient evidence to prove charges of sexual harassment. Despite the complainant's allegations that the accused touched her inappropriately and made indecent remarks on two occasions (September 9 and October 7, 2025), the court noted the complainant and her father's testimony contradicted the charges, and they later settled the dispute outside court. The court held that no credible evidence was presented linking the accused to the alleged acts, leading to his acquittal and cancellation of his bail bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate of Shriwardhan acquitted the accused Suraj Rajesh Gandre under Section 74 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, finding insufficient evidence to prove charges of sexual harassment. Despite the complainant's allegations that the accused touched her inappropriately and made indecent remarks on two occasions (September 9 and October 7, 2025), the court noted the complainant and her father's testimony contradicted the charges, and they later settled the dispute outside court. The court held that no credible evidence was presented linking the accused to the alleged acts, leading to his acquittal and cancellation of his bail bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts