State - Shriwardhan P. S. vs Suraj Rajesh Gandre — 106/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74,. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th March 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG130007362025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

624/2025

Filing Date

19-12-2025

Registration No

106/2025

Registration Date

19-12-2025

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

81

Police Station

Shriwardhan

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74,

Petitioner(s)

State - Shriwardhan P. S.

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Suraj Rajesh Gandre

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN

09-03-2026

Disposed

27-02-2026

Judgment

05-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate of Shriwardhan acquitted the accused Suraj Rajesh Gandre under Section 74 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, finding insufficient evidence to prove charges of sexual harassment. Despite the complainant's allegations that the accused touched her inappropriately and made indecent remarks on two occasions (September 9 and October 7, 2025), the court noted the complainant and her father's testimony contradicted the charges, and they later settled the dispute outside court. The court held that no credible evidence was presented linking the accused to the alleged acts, leading to his acquittal and cancellation of his bail bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate of Shriwardhan acquitted the accused Suraj Rajesh Gandre under Section 74 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, finding insufficient evidence to prove charges of sexual harassment. Despite the complainant's allegations that the accused touched her inappropriately and made indecent remarks on two occasions (September 9 and October 7, 2025), the court noted the complainant and her father's testimony contradicted the charges, and they later settled the dispute outside court. The court held that no credible evidence was presented linking the accused to the alleged acts, leading to his acquittal and cancellation of his bail bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case