State - Mhasla P.S. vs Sandesh Hiru Tambe — 390/2022

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG130007322022

Case disposed

Filing Number

645/2022

Filing Date

14-12-2022

Registration No

390/2022

Registration Date

14-12-2022

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

125

Police Station

Mhasle

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65 E

Petitioner(s)

State - Mhasla P.S.

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Sandesh Hiru Tambe

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN

12-03-2026

Disposed

21-01-2026

Awaiting Summons

21-11-2025

Awaiting Summons

29-09-2025

Awaiting Summons

18-07-2025

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary of Case 390/2022 The court discharged accused Sandesh Hiru Tambe of charges under section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, invoking section 258 of the CrPC. The case remained pending for 4 years due to prosecution's failure to secure the accused's and witnesses' presence despite the chargesheet being filed within a month of the alleged offense on 22/11/2022. The court found it just and proper to terminate proceedings under the special disposal drive, canceling bail bonds and discharging the surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 390/2022 The court discharged accused Sandesh Hiru Tambe of charges under section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, invoking section 258 of the CrPC. The case remained pending for 4 years due to prosecution's failure to secure the accused's and witnesses' presence despite the chargesheet being filed within a month of the alleged offense on 22/11/2022. The court found it just and proper to terminate proceedings under the special disposal drive, canceling bail bonds and discharging the surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case