Deriyas Firoz Wadiya vs 1. Dilip Dattatray Kadam Advocate - Adv. Adesh Shiravatkar — 34/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34 ,39. Status: Hearing Without W.S.. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG130006022023
Next Hearing
06th May 2026
e-Filing Number
20-10-2023
Filing Number
71/2023
Filing Date
21-10-2023
Registration No
34/2023
Registration Date
21-10-2023
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Deriyas Firoz Wadiya
Adv. Mandar Thosar
Respondent(s)
1. Dilip Dattatray Kadam Advocate - Adv. Adesh Shiravatkar
2. Dinesh Dattatrey Kadam
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Hearing Without W.S.
Hearing Without W.S.
Hearing Without W.S.
Hearing Without W.S.
Hearing Without W.S.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing Without W.S. | |
| 12-01-2026 | Hearing Without W.S. | |
| 27-11-2025 | Hearing Without W.S. | |
| 29-10-2025 | Hearing Without W.S. | |
| 17-09-2025 | Hearing Without W.S. |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application to appoint a court commissioner to inspect and measure the disputed property in this possession and ownership suit. The judge held that a court commissioner cannot be appointed merely to collect evidence on behalf of parties, and since this case involves an alleged encroachment rather than a boundary dispute, there is no justification for such appointment. The application was dismissed with costs in cause (31/07/2025, Civil Judge Junior Division, Shrivardhan). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application to appoint a court commissioner to inspect and measure the disputed property in this possession and ownership suit. The judge held that a court commissioner cannot be appointed merely to collect evidence on behalf of parties, and since this case involves an alleged encroachment rather than a boundary dispute, there is no justification for such appointment. The application was dismissed with costs in cause (31/07/2025, Civil Judge Junior Division, Shrivardhan). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts