Deriyas Firoz Wadiya vs 1. Dilip Dattatray Kadam Advocate - Adv. Adesh Shiravatkar — 34/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34 ,39. Status: Hearing Without W.S.. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHRG130006022023

Hearing Without W.S.

Next Hearing

06th May 2026

e-Filing Number

20-10-2023

Filing Number

71/2023

Filing Date

21-10-2023

Registration No

34/2023

Registration Date

21-10-2023

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34 ,39

Petitioner(s)

Deriyas Firoz Wadiya

Adv. Mandar Thosar

Respondent(s)

1. Dilip Dattatray Kadam Advocate - Adv. Adesh Shiravatkar

2. Dinesh Dattatrey Kadam

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN

10-03-2026

Hearing Without W.S.

12-01-2026

Hearing Without W.S.

27-11-2025

Hearing Without W.S.

29-10-2025

Hearing Without W.S.

17-09-2025

Hearing Without W.S.

Interim Orders

31-07-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application to appoint a court commissioner to inspect and measure the disputed property in this possession and ownership suit. The judge held that a court commissioner cannot be appointed merely to collect evidence on behalf of parties, and since this case involves an alleged encroachment rather than a boundary dispute, there is no justification for such appointment. The application was dismissed with costs in cause (31/07/2025, Civil Judge Junior Division, Shrivardhan). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application to appoint a court commissioner to inspect and measure the disputed property in this possession and ownership suit. The judge held that a court commissioner cannot be appointed merely to collect evidence on behalf of parties, and since this case involves an alleged encroachment rather than a boundary dispute, there is no justification for such appointment. The application was dismissed with costs in cause (31/07/2025, Civil Judge Junior Division, Shrivardhan). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case