Deriyas Firoz Wadiya vs 1. Dilip Dattatray Kadam Advocate - Adv. Adesh Shiravatkar — 34/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34 ,39. Status: Hearing Without W.S.. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG130006022023
e-Filing Number
20-10-2023
Filing Number
71/2023
Filing Date
21-Oct-2023
Registration No
34/2023
Registration Date
21-Oct-2023
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan
Judge
1-CIVIL Judge J D And J M F C Shriwardhan
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Deriyas Firoz Wadiya
Adv. Mandar Thosar
Respondent(s)
-
1.1. Dilip Dattatray Kadam Advocate - Adv. Adesh Shiravatkar
-
2.2. Dinesh Dattatrey Kadam
Case History
-
06-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing Without W.S.
CIVIL Judge J D And J M F C Shriwardhan
-
12-Jan-2026
Hearing Without W.S.
CIVIL Judge J D And J M F C Shriwardhan
-
27-Nov-2025
Hearing Without W.S.
CIVIL Judge J D And J M F C Shriwardhan
-
29-Oct-2025
Hearing Without W.S.
CIVIL Judge J D And J M F C Shriwardhan
-
17-Sep-2025
Hearing Without W.S.
CIVIL Judge J D And J M F C Shriwardhan
-
31-Jul-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application to appoint a court commissioner to inspect and measure the disputed property in this possession and ownership suit. The judge held that a court commissioner cannot be appointed merely to collect evidence on behalf of parties, and since this case involves an alleged encroachment rather than a boundary dispute, there is no justification for such appointment. The application was dismissed with costs in cause (31/07/2025, Civil Judge Junior Division, Shrivardhan). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Jul-2025
Hearing Without W.S.
CIVIL Judge J D And J M F C Shriwardhan
-
16-Jul-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J D And J M F C Shriwardhan
-
17-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J D And J M F C Shriwardhan
-
03-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J D And J M F C Shriwardhan
-
06-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J D And J M F C Shriwardhan
-
06-Feb-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J D And J M F C Shriwardhan
-
21-Dec-2024
Reply/Say
CIVIL Judge J D And J M F C Shriwardhan
-
16-Nov-2024
Reply/Say
CIVIL Judge J D And J M F C Shriwardhan
-
17-Oct-2024
Reply/Say
CIVIL Judge J D And J M F C Shriwardhan
-
24-Sep-2024
Hearing Without W.S.
CIVIL Judge J D And J M F C Shriwardhan
-
20-Jun-2024
Hearing Without W.S.
CIVIL Judge J D And J M F C Shriwardhan
-
20-Apr-2024
Hearing Without W.S.
CIVIL Judge J D And J M F C Shriwardhan
-
06-Apr-2024
No W.S. Order
CIVIL Judge J D And J M F C Shriwardhan
-
03-Mar-2024
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge J D And J M F C Shriwardhan
-
26-Feb-2024
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge J D And J M F C Shriwardhan
-
05-Jan-2024
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge J D And J M F C Shriwardhan
-
03-Jan-2024
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge J D And J M F C Shriwardhan
-
05-Dec-2023
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge J D And J M F C Shriwardhan
-
21-Oct-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 34/2023
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application to appoint a court commissioner to inspect and measure the disputed property in this possession and ownership suit. The judge held that a court commissioner cannot be appointed merely to collect evidence on behalf of parties, and since this case involves an alleged encroachment rather than a boundary dispute, there is no justification for such appointment. The application was dismissed with costs in cause (31/07/2025, Civil Judge Junior Division, Shrivardhan). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts