State Excise Department Mangaon vs Ganesh Narayan Kambali Advocate - Gandhi Taniya R. — 291/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG130004552024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
376/2024
Filing Date
11-10-2024
Registration No
291/2024
Registration Date
11-10-2024
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Excise Department Mangaon
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Ganesh Narayan Kambali Advocate - Gandhi Taniya R.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Disposed
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 22-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 30-12-2025 | Filing of Surety | |
| 17-11-2025 | Filing of Surety |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused, Ganesh Narayana Kambli, of charges under the Maharashtra Excise Act, Section 65(E), for allegedly possessing 30 liters of country liquor for unlawful sale. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, citing significant gaps in the chain of custody of the seized materials and lack of corroborating evidence from prosecution witnesses who contradicted the police narrative during cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted the accused, Ganesh Narayana Kambli, of charges under the Maharashtra Excise Act, Section 65(E), for allegedly possessing 30 liters of country liquor for unlawful sale. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, citing significant gaps in the chain of custody of the seized materials and lack of corroborating evidence from prosecution witnesses who contradicted the police narrative during cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts