State Excise Department Mangaon vs Ganesh Narayan Kambali Advocate - Gandhi Taniya R. — 291/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th April 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG130004552024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

376/2024

Filing Date

11-10-2024

Registration No

291/2024

Registration Date

11-10-2024

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN

Decision Date

06th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

State Excise Department Mangaon

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Ganesh Narayan Kambali Advocate - Gandhi Taniya R.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN

06-04-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

22-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

30-12-2025

Filing of Surety

17-11-2025

Filing of Surety

Final Orders / Judgements

06-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

The court acquitted the accused, Ganesh Narayana Kambli, of charges under the Maharashtra Excise Act, Section 65(E), for allegedly possessing 30 liters of country liquor for unlawful sale. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, citing significant gaps in the chain of custody of the seized materials and lack of corroborating evidence from prosecution witnesses who contradicted the police narrative during cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused, Ganesh Narayana Kambli, of charges under the Maharashtra Excise Act, Section 65(E), for allegedly possessing 30 liters of country liquor for unlawful sale. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, citing significant gaps in the chain of custody of the seized materials and lack of corroborating evidence from prosecution witnesses who contradicted the police narrative during cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case