State Excise Department Alibag vs Rajendra Dattatray Todankar — 284/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 27th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG130004452024
Filing Number
372/2024
Filing Date
08-10-2024
Registration No
284/2024
Registration Date
08-10-2024
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Excise Department Alibag
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Rajendra Dattatray Todankar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Disposed
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
Awaiting Warrant
Filing of Surety
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 31-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-01-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 28-11-2025 | Filing of Surety |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 284/2024 Court Decision: The court acquitted respondent Rajendra Dattatray Todankar of charges under Maharashtra Excise Act, Section 65(E), for alleged unauthorized sale of country liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the two key witnesses could not support the prosecution's version, and critical gaps existed in evidence regarding seizure, storage, and maintenance of the confiscated liquor samples, raising doubts about evidence integrity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 284/2024 Court Decision: The court acquitted respondent Rajendra Dattatray Todankar of charges under Maharashtra Excise Act, Section 65(E), for alleged unauthorized sale of country liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the two key witnesses could not support the prosecution's version, and critical gaps existed in evidence regarding seizure, storage, and maintenance of the confiscated liquor samples, raising doubts about evidence integrity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts