Bhiku Sudam Shilkar and Oth 3 vs Ravindra Bhiku Shilkar and Oth — 47/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Verification. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG130003862019
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
71/2019
Filing Date
17-12-2019
Registration No
47/2019
Registration Date
17-12-2019
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhiku Sudam Shilkar and Oth 3
Adv. Vartak P. H.
Raghunath Sudam Shilkar
Adv. Adv. Adesh Shiravatkar
Bebi Pandurang Nakrekar
Adv. Adv. Adesh Shiravatkar
Nirmala Sharad Golipkar
Adv. Adv. Adesh Shiravatkar
Respondent(s)
Ravindra Bhiku Shilkar and Oth
Kumar Thanmal Bhandari
Adv. Datar S.D.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Verification
Verification
Verification
Verification
Verification
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Verification |
| 12-03-2026 | Verification |
| 23-01-2026 | Verification |
| 04-12-2025 | Verification |
| 07-11-2025 | Verification |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 47/2019 Court Order (dated 25/11/2022): The court dismissed Respondent 2's counter-claim and directed that the order on the main petition be finalized. The court held that Respondent 2 has no legal right or ownership claim over the disputed agricultural property, as possession and beneficial interest remain with Petitioners 1-3 and Respondent 1. The court rejected Respondent 2's assertion of ownership and granted relief to the petitioners while rejecting the respondent's plea to annul the sale deed in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 47/2019 Court Order (dated 25/11/2022): The court dismissed Respondent 2's counter-claim and directed that the order on the main petition be finalized. The court held that Respondent 2 has no legal right or ownership claim over the disputed agricultural property, as possession and beneficial interest remain with Petitioners 1-3 and Respondent 1. The court rejected Respondent 2's assertion of ownership and granted relief to the petitioners while rejecting the respondent's plea to annul the sale deed in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts