Saher Mubasshir Dhanse Before marriage name Saher Ahmad saldurkar Other 1 vs Mubasshir Abdul Mazid Dhanse Others 2 Advocate - Jaideep Dipak Tambutkar — 6/2025
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section कलम१२,१८,२०,२२व२३अन्वये. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHRG130003382025
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
e-Filing Number
26-06-2025
Filing Number
283/2025
Filing Date
03-07-2025
Registration No
6/2025
Registration Date
03-07-2025
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Saher Mubasshir Dhanse Before marriage name Saher Ahmad saldurkar Other 1
Adv. Adv. Atul Arvind Chaugule
Marayam Mubasshir Dhanse
Adv. Adv. Atul Arvind Chaugule
Respondent(s)
Mubasshir Abdul Mazid Dhanse Others 2 Advocate - Jaideep Dipak Tambutkar
Zubeda A Mazid Dhanse
Fahad A Mazid Dhanse
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 27-03-2026 | Appearance | |
| 16-03-2026 | Appearance | |
| 10-03-2026 | Appearance | |
| 22-01-2026 | Appearance |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court ordered that the case (PWDVA No.06/2025) shall proceed ex-parte against respondent no.1, who resides outside India and deliberately avoided court proceedings despite valid service of notice via WhatsApp and knowledge through respondent nos. 2 and 3 (his mother and brother) who appeared before the court. The Judicial Magistrate found respondent no.1 to be deliberately evading the proceedings and therefore proceeded to pass the ex-parte order on 09/04/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court ordered that the case (PWDVA No.06/2025) shall proceed ex-parte against respondent no.1, who resides outside India and deliberately avoided court proceedings despite valid service of notice via WhatsApp and knowledge through respondent nos. 2 and 3 (his mother and brother) who appeared before the court. The Judicial Magistrate found respondent no.1 to be deliberately evading the proceedings and therefore proceeded to pass the ex-parte order on 09/04/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts