Sarika Subhas Ambre vs subhash Dattaram Ambre Advocate - Chougule A.A. — 98/2020

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 18,19,20,22,23. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHRG130003362020

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

316/2020

Filing Date

12-11-2020

Registration No

98/2020

Registration Date

12-11-2020

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 18,19,20,22,23

Petitioner(s)

Sarika Subhas Ambre

Adv. Datar S.D.

Respondent(s)

subhash Dattaram Ambre Advocate - Chougule A.A.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN

12-05-2026

Evidence Part Heard

08-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

12-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

18-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

17-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

15-12-2020
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 98/2020 Sarika Subhas Ambre v. Subhash Dattaram Ambre The petitioner sought interim maintenance for herself and her two children from her estranged husband. The court found that the respondent's monthly income was approximately Rs. 9,500 based on documented evidence (salary certificate from Shruthi Transports), and rejected the respondent's unsubstantiated claims of higher income. The court ordered the respondent to pay monthly maintenance of Rs. 3,000 to the petitioner for her maintenance and medical expenses, pending final adjudication of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 98/2020 Sarika Subhas Ambre v. Subhash Dattaram Ambre The petitioner sought interim maintenance for herself and her two children from her estranged husband. The court found that the respondent's monthly income was approximately Rs. 9,500 based on documented evidence (salary certificate from Shruthi Transports), and rejected the respondent's unsubstantiated claims of higher income. The court ordered the respondent to pay monthly maintenance of Rs. 3,000 to the petitioner for her maintenance and medical expenses, pending final adjudication of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case