State of Maharashtra vs Hwabibi Abdul Raheman Kurawale and 2 Advocate - Wavekar R.R. — 45/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,406,465,474,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG130003172018
Filing Number
278/2018
Filing Date
18-07-2018
Registration No
45/2018
Registration Date
18-07-2018
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
3
Police Station
Shriwardhan
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Hwabibi Abdul Raheman Kurawale and 2 Advocate - Wavekar R.R.
Abadul Kadir Raut
Adv. Wavekar R.R.
Allauddin Umar Sange
Adv. Wavekar R.R.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Disposed
Judgment
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 23-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 30-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Hwabibi Abdul Raheman Kurawale (Case 45/2018) The court acquitted accused Allauddin Umar Sange of charges under IPC sections 420, 406, 465, 471, 506, and 34 for alleged fraud involving forged property documents and inheritance claims. The court found that the prosecution failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove the accused's involvement in the conspiracy, despite accusations that he created false documents and fraudulently transferred ancestral properties belonging to the complainant's deceased father. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Hwabibi Abdul Raheman Kurawale (Case 45/2018) The court acquitted accused Allauddin Umar Sange of charges under IPC sections 420, 406, 465, 471, 506, and 34 for alleged fraud involving forged property documents and inheritance claims. The court found that the prosecution failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove the accused's involvement in the conspiracy, despite accusations that he created false documents and fraudulently transferred ancestral properties belonging to the complainant's deceased father. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts