Dinkar Keru Varankar vs Prabhakar Ganesh Keru Varankar and Oth 3 Advocate - Wavekar R.R. — 39/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG130003072019
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
58/2019
Filing Date
27-09-2019
Registration No
39/2019
Registration Date
27-09-2019
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dinkar Keru Varankar
Adv. Datar S.D.
Respondent(s)
Prabhakar Ganesh Keru Varankar and Oth 3 Advocate - Wavekar R.R.
Pramod Namdev Keru Varankar
Adv. Wavekar R.R.
Ranjana Keru Varankar
Chairman,Chinchmata Gramin Bigarsheti Sahkari Patsanstha Ltd.
Adv. Wavekar R.R.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Issues
Issues
Amended Plaint
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Issues | |
| 10-03-2026 | Issues | |
| 06-02-2026 | Amended Plaint | |
| 28-01-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 03-01-2026 | Reply/Say |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Civil Judge allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint in this partition suit (Regular Civil Suit No. 39/2019). The amendment permits the plaintiff to add Grampanchayat (village council) names to clarify the jurisdiction of the suit properties and delete an inadvertently included property description. The court found the amendments were merely clarifications that would assist in determining the real controversy without changing the suit's nature or prejudicing the defendants, as trial had not yet commenced. The plaintiff must complete the amendment within 14 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Civil Judge allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint in this partition suit (Regular Civil Suit No. 39/2019). The amendment permits the plaintiff to add Grampanchayat (village council) names to clarify the jurisdiction of the suit properties and delete an inadvertently included property description. The court found the amendments were merely clarifications that would assist in determining the real controversy without changing the suit's nature or prejudicing the defendants, as trial had not yet commenced. The plaintiff must complete the amendment within 14 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts