Vilas Ramesh Gholap vs Sachin Shishikant Potnis and — 1400051/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420, 468, 463, 464, 34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG130002742015
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1400040/2015
Filing Date
10-07-2015
Registration No
1400051/2015
Registration Date
05-09-2015
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vilas Ramesh Gholap
Adv. Datar S.D.
Respondent(s)
Sachin Shishikant Potnis and
Arunkumar Manilal Doshi
Anil Jayant Kulkarni
Adv. Lad M.G.
Hirachand Ganpat Shigvan
Adv. Wavekar R.R.
Yogesh Ananat Shildhankar
Adv. Zatam Mubin
Mahendra Ramchandra Jamdar
Adv. Zatam Mubin
santosh Sashikant Pothnish
Adv. Zatam Mubin
Rajkumar Kashinath Dhotalekar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Disposed
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Awaiting Warrant | |
| 23-02-2026 | Awaiting Warrant | |
| 16-02-2026 | Awaiting Warrant | |
| 09-01-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
Final Orders / Judgements
The JMFC Shrivardhan dismissed the criminal complaint (RCC No.51/2015) for non-prosecution after the complainant failed to secure the presence of accused persons and remained continuously absent. The court found that the complainant had lost interest in prosecuting the case involving offences under IPC sections 420, 468, 464, and 34, and accordingly discharged all accused persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The JMFC Shrivardhan dismissed the criminal complaint (RCC No.51/2015) for non-prosecution after the complainant failed to secure the presence of accused persons and remained continuously absent. The court found that the complainant had lost interest in prosecuting the case involving offences under IPC sections 420, 468, 464, and 34, and accordingly discharged all accused persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts