Baban Govind Pangare and 01 vs Sandip krushna kavilkar Advocate - Datar S.D. — 1400028/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Awaiting Report of Commissioner. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG130002532015
Next Hearing
30th June 2026
Filing Number
1400029/2015
Filing Date
15-07-2015
Registration No
1400028/2015
Registration Date
15-07-2015
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Baban Govind Pangare and 01
Adv. Vadhavkar A.B.
Respondent(s)
Sandip krushna kavilkar Advocate - Datar S.D.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Awaiting Report of Commissioner
Awaiting Report of Commissioner
Awaiting Report of Commissioner
Awaiting Report of Commissioner
Awaiting Report of Commissioner
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Awaiting Report of Commissioner |
| 12-03-2026 | Awaiting Report of Commissioner |
| 13-02-2026 | Awaiting Report of Commissioner |
| 06-01-2026 | Awaiting Report of Commissioner |
| 25-11-2025 | Awaiting Report of Commissioner |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS No. 28/2015 (Baban vs. Sandeep) The court allowed the defendant's application for appointment of a Court Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC. T.I.L.R. Shriwardhan was appointed as Court Commissioner to conduct joint measurement of Gaonthan plots No.57 and 49 to determine alleged encroachment. The defendant was directed to deposit measurement charges, both parties must supply necessary documents, and the Commissioner must submit a detailed report identifying any encroachments found. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS No. 28/2015 (Baban vs. Sandeep) The court allowed the defendant's application for appointment of a Court Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC. T.I.L.R. Shriwardhan was appointed as Court Commissioner to conduct joint measurement of Gaonthan plots No.57 and 49 to determine alleged encroachment. The defendant was directed to deposit measurement charges, both parties must supply necessary documents, and the Commissioner must submit a detailed report identifying any encroachments found. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts