State - Excise Department 01 Alibag vs Suvarna Shailesh Polekar Advocate - Lad M.G. — 115/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG130001862025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

157/2025

Filing Date

28-03-2025

Registration No

115/2025

Registration Date

28-03-2025

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

State - Excise Department 01 Alibag

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Suvarna Shailesh Polekar Advocate - Lad M.G.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN

10-03-2026

Disposed

12-02-2026

Arguments

07-01-2026

Arguments

25-11-2025

Arguments

12-11-2025

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Suvarna Shailesh Polekar, of charges under the Maharashtra Excise Act, Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing and selling 25 liters of illicit liquor without permission. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the key witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's claims and no chemical analysis report was submitted to confirm the seized substance was actually liquor. Consequently, the accused was declared not guilty, her bail bond was cancelled, and the seized material was ordered to be disposed of according to regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Suvarna Shailesh Polekar, of charges under the Maharashtra Excise Act, Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing and selling 25 liters of illicit liquor without permission. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the key witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's claims and no chemical analysis report was submitted to confirm the seized substance was actually liquor. Consequently, the accused was declared not guilty, her bail bond was cancelled, and the seized material was ordered to be disposed of according to regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case