State - Excise Department 01 Alibag vs Suvarna Shailesh Polekar Advocate - Lad M.G. — 115/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG130001862025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
157/2025
Filing Date
28-03-2025
Registration No
115/2025
Registration Date
28-03-2025
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State - Excise Department 01 Alibag
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Suvarna Shailesh Polekar Advocate - Lad M.G.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 07-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 25-11-2025 | Arguments | |
| 12-11-2025 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Suvarna Shailesh Polekar, of charges under the Maharashtra Excise Act, Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing and selling 25 liters of illicit liquor without permission. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the key witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's claims and no chemical analysis report was submitted to confirm the seized substance was actually liquor. Consequently, the accused was declared not guilty, her bail bond was cancelled, and the seized material was ordered to be disposed of according to regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Suvarna Shailesh Polekar, of charges under the Maharashtra Excise Act, Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing and selling 25 liters of illicit liquor without permission. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the key witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's claims and no chemical analysis report was submitted to confirm the seized substance was actually liquor. Consequently, the accused was declared not guilty, her bail bond was cancelled, and the seized material was ordered to be disposed of according to regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts