Kartiki Naresh More vs Naresh Vijay More Advocate - Sadhu Y. M. — 44/2019
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,20,22,23. Status: For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHRG130001432019
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
106/2019
Filing Date
22-04-2019
Registration No
44/2019
Registration Date
22-04-2019
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kartiki Naresh More
Adv. Chougule A.A.
Respondent(s)
Naresh Vijay More Advocate - Sadhu Y. M.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready | |
| 02-04-2026 | For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready | |
| 24-02-2026 | For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready | |
| 20-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed by the non-applicant (Naresh) to set aside the evidence closed order dated 13/06/2024 is allowed. The court permitted him to lead his evidence on record, finding that although sufficient time was granted since 10/02/2023, he had deliberately delayed proceedings. However, the non-applicant must pay costs of Rs. 5,000 to the applicant (Kartiki) on or before the next date and is directed to conduct the matter with due diligence without unnecessary adjournments. This is a maintenance case under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence (PWDV) Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed by the non-applicant (Naresh) to set aside the evidence closed order dated 13/06/2024 is allowed. The court permitted him to lead his evidence on record, finding that although sufficient time was granted since 10/02/2023, he had deliberately delayed proceedings. However, the non-applicant must pay costs of Rs. 5,000 to the applicant (Kartiki) on or before the next date and is directed to conduct the matter with due diligence without unnecessary adjournments. This is a maintenance case under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence (PWDV) Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts