Nadim Fairoz Bodlaji vs Fairoz Abdul Rauf Bodlaji Other 1 Advocate - Datar S.D. — 7/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,39अन्वये. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG130001082025
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
e-Filing Number
24-02-2025
Filing Number
22/2025
Filing Date
24-02-2025
Registration No
7/2025
Registration Date
24-02-2025
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nadim Fairoz Bodlaji
Adv. Joshi R.M.
Respondent(s)
Fairoz Abdul Rauf Bodlaji Other 1 Advocate - Datar S.D.
Nazira Alias Nazzu Fairoz Bodlaji
Adv. Datar S.D.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 24-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 08-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 09-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court rejected the defendants' application to dismiss the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the CPC on the ground that it was barred by Muslim Personal Law. The court held that at the stage of considering plaint rejection, only the plaintiff's averments need be examined, and questions regarding legal ownership and rights in the property are matters for evidence. Since the plaintiff has pleaded possession of the suit properties and stated a cause of action, the suit cannot be dismissed merely on the defendants' contentions regarding Muslim Law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected the defendants' application to dismiss the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the CPC on the ground that it was barred by Muslim Personal Law. The court held that at the stage of considering plaint rejection, only the plaintiff's averments need be examined, and questions regarding legal ownership and rights in the property are matters for evidence. Since the plaintiff has pleaded possession of the suit properties and stated a cause of action, the suit cannot be dismissed merely on the defendants' contentions regarding Muslim Law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts