Nadim Fairoz Bodlaji vs Fairoz Abdul Rauf Bodlaji Other 1 Advocate - Datar S.D. — 7/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,39अन्वये. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHRG130001082025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

e-Filing Number

24-02-2025

Filing Number

22/2025

Filing Date

24-02-2025

Registration No

7/2025

Registration Date

24-02-2025

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,39अन्वये

Petitioner(s)

Nadim Fairoz Bodlaji

Adv. Joshi R.M.

Respondent(s)

Fairoz Abdul Rauf Bodlaji Other 1 Advocate - Datar S.D.

Nazira Alias Nazzu Fairoz Bodlaji

Adv. Datar S.D.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN

15-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

10-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

24-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

08-01-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

09-12-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court rejected the defendants' application to dismiss the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the CPC on the ground that it was barred by Muslim Personal Law. The court held that at the stage of considering plaint rejection, only the plaintiff's averments need be examined, and questions regarding legal ownership and rights in the property are matters for evidence. Since the plaintiff has pleaded possession of the suit properties and stated a cause of action, the suit cannot be dismissed merely on the defendants' contentions regarding Muslim Law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the defendants' application to dismiss the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the CPC on the ground that it was barred by Muslim Personal Law. The court held that at the stage of considering plaint rejection, only the plaintiff's averments need be examined, and questions regarding legal ownership and rights in the property are matters for evidence. Since the plaintiff has pleaded possession of the suit properties and stated a cause of action, the suit cannot be dismissed merely on the defendants' contentions regarding Muslim Law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case