Ishan Vedprakash Yadav vs State Of Maharashtra — 3/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 09th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHRG130000612026
e-Filing Number
02-02-2026
Filing Number
55/2026
Filing Date
03-02-2026
Registration No
3/2026
Registration Date
03-02-2026
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
Police Station
Mhasle
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ishan Vedprakash Yadav
Adv. Adv.Manesh Gopal Lad
Respondent(s)
State Of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Disposed
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 04-03-2026 | W.S. and Say | |
| 23-02-2026 | W.S. and Say | |
| 18-02-2026 | W.S. and Say | |
| 16-02-2026 | W.S. and Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court allowed the applicant's Section 503 BNSS application for interim custody of domestic articles (furniture and appliances worth ₹17,000) stolen from his residence and recovered during investigation. The court reasoned that retaining seized domestic articles at the police station serves no purpose and cited the landmark Sundarabhai Ambala Desai case directing expeditious release of such muddemals. The applicant was granted custody upon executing a ₹25,000 indemnity bond, with conditions including photography documentation and detailed panchanama by the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the applicant's Section 503 BNSS application for interim custody of domestic articles (furniture and appliances worth ₹17,000) stolen from his residence and recovered during investigation. The court reasoned that retaining seized domestic articles at the police station serves no purpose and cited the landmark Sundarabhai Ambala Desai case directing expeditious release of such muddemals. The applicant was granted custody upon executing a ₹25,000 indemnity bond, with conditions including photography documentation and detailed panchanama by the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts