Jamil Bashir Mandlekar vs Aijaj Umar Ukaye Advocate - Shaikh Z. J. — 4/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG130000552025
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
e-Filing Number
21-01-2025
Filing Number
7/2025
Filing Date
22-01-2025
Registration No
4/2025
Registration Date
22-01-2025
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jamil Bashir Mandlekar
Adv. VADHAVKAR ASHISH BAJIRAO
Respondent(s)
Aijaj Umar Ukaye Advocate - Shaikh Z. J.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN
Evidence
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Issues |
| 09-02-2026 | Issues |
| 03-01-2026 | Issues |
| 20-11-2025 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 4/2025 Petitioner: Jamil Bashir Mandlekar Respondent: Aijaj Umar Ukaye Court: Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shrivardhan The petitioner sought appointment of a court receiver to manage mango trees on a disputed agricultural property and oversee their harvest during the 2025 season. The court found that the respondent had contracted with a third party (Anil Pangarkar) for the 2024-2025 season harvest, and the petitioner failed to provide credible evidence of performing continuous maintenance work on the orchard during the contractual period. The court granted the petitioner's petition and appointed a court receiver to manage and harvest the mango trees, with proceeds to be held pending final judgment on the underlying property dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 4/2025 Petitioner: Jamil Bashir Mandlekar Respondent: Aijaj Umar Ukaye Court: Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shrivardhan The petitioner sought appointment of a court receiver to manage mango trees on a disputed agricultural property and oversee their harvest during the 2025 season. The court found that the respondent had contracted with a third party (Anil Pangarkar) for the 2024-2025 season harvest, and the petitioner failed to provide credible evidence of performing continuous maintenance work on the orchard during the contractual period. The court granted the petitioner's petition and appointed a court receiver to manage and harvest the mango trees, with proceeds to be held pending final judgment on the underlying property dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts