Jamil Bashir Mandlekar vs Aijaj Umar Ukaye Advocate - Shaikh Z. J. — 4/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHRG130000552025

Evidence

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

e-Filing Number

21-01-2025

Filing Number

7/2025

Filing Date

22-01-2025

Registration No

4/2025

Registration Date

22-01-2025

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 9

Petitioner(s)

Jamil Bashir Mandlekar

Adv. VADHAVKAR ASHISH BAJIRAO

Respondent(s)

Aijaj Umar Ukaye Advocate - Shaikh Z. J.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J D AND J M F C SHRIWARDHAN

01-04-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Issues

09-02-2026

Issues

03-01-2026

Issues

20-11-2025

Issues

Interim Orders

25-04-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 4/2025 Petitioner: Jamil Bashir Mandlekar Respondent: Aijaj Umar Ukaye Court: Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shrivardhan The petitioner sought appointment of a court receiver to manage mango trees on a disputed agricultural property and oversee their harvest during the 2025 season. The court found that the respondent had contracted with a third party (Anil Pangarkar) for the 2024-2025 season harvest, and the petitioner failed to provide credible evidence of performing continuous maintenance work on the orchard during the contractual period. The court granted the petitioner's petition and appointed a court receiver to manage and harvest the mango trees, with proceeds to be held pending final judgment on the underlying property dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 4/2025 Petitioner: Jamil Bashir Mandlekar Respondent: Aijaj Umar Ukaye Court: Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shrivardhan The petitioner sought appointment of a court receiver to manage mango trees on a disputed agricultural property and oversee their harvest during the 2025 season. The court found that the respondent had contracted with a third party (Anil Pangarkar) for the 2024-2025 season harvest, and the petitioner failed to provide credible evidence of performing continuous maintenance work on the orchard during the contractual period. The court granted the petitioner's petition and appointed a court receiver to manage and harvest the mango trees, with proceeds to be held pending final judgment on the underlying property dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.Shriwardhan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case