State Through State Excise Dept., Murud. vs Varsha Vasant Patil — 324/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 - e. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 07th May 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG120004992023

Case disposed

Filing Number

452/2023

Filing Date

18-12-2023

Registration No

324/2023

Registration Date

18-12-2023

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Murud

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE

FIR Details

FIR Number

65

Police Station

State Excise Department, Murud-Janjira,

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65 - e

Petitioner(s)

State Through State Excise Dept., Murud.

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Varsha Vasant Patil

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud

07-05-2026

Disposed

30-04-2026

Evidence

01-04-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

23-02-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

07-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary of Case 324/2023 (State vs. Varsha Vasant Patil): The court discontinued proceedings against Varsha Vasant Patil under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act violation case. The decision was based on the prosecution's repeated failure to secure witness attendance despite repeated summons, absence of a Constable's report, and prolonged pendency. The accused was discharged, and seized property was directed to be forwarded to the State Excise Department for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 324/2023 (State vs. Varsha Vasant Patil): The court discontinued proceedings against Varsha Vasant Patil under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act violation case. The decision was based on the prosecution's repeated failure to secure witness attendance despite repeated summons, absence of a Constable's report, and prolonged pendency. The accused was discharged, and seized property was directed to be forwarded to the State Excise Department for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Murud All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case