State Through State Excise Dept., Murud. vs Varsha Vasant Patil — 324/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 - e. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 07th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG120004992023
Filing Number
452/2023
Filing Date
18-12-2023
Registration No
324/2023
Registration Date
18-12-2023
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Murud
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
65
Police Station
State Excise Department, Murud-Janjira,
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Through State Excise Dept., Murud.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Varsha Vasant Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 324/2023 (State vs. Varsha Vasant Patil): The court discontinued proceedings against Varsha Vasant Patil under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act violation case. The decision was based on the prosecution's repeated failure to secure witness attendance despite repeated summons, absence of a Constable's report, and prolonged pendency. The accused was discharged, and seized property was directed to be forwarded to the State Excise Department for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 324/2023 (State vs. Varsha Vasant Patil): The court discontinued proceedings against Varsha Vasant Patil under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act violation case. The decision was based on the prosecution's repeated failure to secure witness attendance despite repeated summons, absence of a Constable's report, and prolonged pendency. The accused was discharged, and seized property was directed to be forwarded to the State Excise Department for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts