Alka Balasaheb Bhingare and 1 vs Taramati Harishchandra Rajpurkar and 1 Advocate - Patil D.N. — 24/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34, 38, 39. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG120004912024
Next Hearing
06th May 2026
e-Filing Number
11-12-2024
Filing Number
56/2024
Filing Date
12-12-2024
Registration No
24/2024
Registration Date
12-12-2024
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Murud
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Alka Balasaheb Bhingare and 1
Adv. Prathmesh Prakash Potdar
Jeevan Balasaheb Bhingare
Adv. POTDAR PRATHAMESH PRAKASH
Respondent(s)
Taramati Harishchandra Rajpurkar and 1 Advocate - Patil D.N.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Steps_Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 21-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 15-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 23-12-2025 | Steps_Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition (Petition No. 21/2024) filed by Alka Balasaheb Bhingare and others against Taramati Harishchandra Rajapurkar and others is allowed. The court condoned the delay in filing the written statement by the defendants and set aside the previous order against them. The defendants are permitted to file their written statement on the condition that they pay Rs. 700 as costs to the plaintiffs for the delay in hearing the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition (Petition No. 21/2024) filed by Alka Balasaheb Bhingare and others against Taramati Harishchandra Rajapurkar and others is allowed. The court condoned the delay in filing the written statement by the defendants and set aside the previous order against them. The defendants are permitted to file their written statement on the condition that they pay Rs. 700 as costs to the plaintiffs for the delay in hearing the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts