Devnath Hiru Mahadik and 1 vs Kashinath Mahadeo Mahadik and 8 Advocate - Patil Rupesh S. — 29/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG120004892022
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
59/2022
Filing Date
25-11-2022
Registration No
29/2022
Registration Date
25-11-2022
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Murud
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Devnath Hiru Mahadik and 1
Adv. Shedge V.S.
Sau. Sangita Santosh Chordhekar
Respondent(s)
Kashinath Mahadeo Mahadik and 8 Advocate - Patil Rupesh S.
Jitendra Janardan Mahadik
Adv. Patil Rupesh S.
Surendra Janardan Mahadik
Adv. Patil Rupesh S.
Jayashree Mahendra Chordhekar
Lalita Prakash Bhoir
Malati Raghunath Mali
Adv. Patil Rupesh S.
Nanda Rajesh Katkar
Adv. Patil Rupesh S.
Padaybai Balaram Patil
Lakhamubai Raghunath Thakur
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 15-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 18-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: Devano v. Kashinath (Civil Suit No. 29/2022), Murud Court, Raigad District Outcome: The petition is partially allowed. The court granted temporary relief by restraining defendants from creating third-party interests or selling the disputed property pending final judgment. The plaintiff's claim to 1/3 share in the property was rejected on merits, with the court finding that the defendants' title was properly established through valid partition deeds and land records, and the plaintiff lacks legal rights to the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: Devano v. Kashinath (Civil Suit No. 29/2022), Murud Court, Raigad District Outcome: The petition is partially allowed. The court granted temporary relief by restraining defendants from creating third-party interests or selling the disputed property pending final judgment. The plaintiff's claim to 1/3 share in the property was rejected on merits, with the court finding that the defendants' title was properly established through valid partition deeds and land records, and the plaintiff lacks legal rights to the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts