Shobha narendra Penter @ Umrao. vs Sarve Gramastha Thro Panchkamiti, Sushil Tukaram Khopkar and 4 Advocate - Patil D.N. — 27/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 33, 38, 39.. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG120004532022
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
55/2022
Filing Date
09-11-2022
Registration No
27/2022
Registration Date
09-11-2022
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Murud
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shobha narendra Penter @ Umrao.
Adv. देशपांडे आशिष विकास
Respondent(s)
Sarve Gramastha Thro Panchkamiti, Sushil Tukaram Khopkar and 4 Advocate - Patil D.N.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 18-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 13-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready | |
| 09-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready | |
| 06-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
Interim Orders
Summary The petition filed by the appellant (widow of Narendar Umrao Penter) to be included as a necessary party in a civil suit regarding immovable property was dismissed. The court found that while the appellant's husband's name was on the property record (7/12 extract), the respondent (village survey committee) holds a Letter of Administration from the High Court, giving her authority to manage the property. Each party bears its own costs of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The petition filed by the appellant (widow of Narendar Umrao Penter) to be included as a necessary party in a civil suit regarding immovable property was dismissed. The court found that while the appellant's husband's name was on the property record (7/12 extract), the respondent (village survey committee) holds a Letter of Administration from the High Court, giving her authority to manage the property. Each party bears its own costs of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts