State through Murud Police Station vs Sairaj Nathuram Mali — 41/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 79,351(2),352. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG120003032025
Filing Number
271/2025
Filing Date
11-09-2025
Registration No
41/2025
Registration Date
11-09-2025
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Murud
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
62
Police Station
Murud Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State through Murud Police Station
Adv. Naik S. Y.
Respondent(s)
Sairaj Nathuram Mali
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud
Disposed
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 08-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 10-11-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: Case 41/2025 - State v. Sairaj Nathuram Mali The Murud First Class Magistrate Court acquitted accused Sairaj Nathuram Mali on March 12, 2026, finding that the prosecution failed to establish the charges under Indian Penal Code sections 79, 351(2), and 352 (criminal intimidation and insult). The sole complainant-witness testified that she received a threatening phone call in April 2025 and later discovered her photograph set as a WhatsApp display picture, but provided no concrete evidence of the accused's involvement, and the complainant subsequently recanted her allegations. The court found the prosecution's case lacked sufficient solid evidence and held the accused entitled to acquittal under the principle that guilt must be proven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Case 41/2025 - State v. Sairaj Nathuram Mali The Murud First Class Magistrate Court acquitted accused Sairaj Nathuram Mali on March 12, 2026, finding that the prosecution failed to establish the charges under Indian Penal Code sections 79, 351(2), and 352 (criminal intimidation and insult). The sole complainant-witness testified that she received a threatening phone call in April 2025 and later discovered her photograph set as a WhatsApp display picture, but provided no concrete evidence of the accused's involvement, and the complainant subsequently recanted her allegations. The court found the prosecution's case lacked sufficient solid evidence and held the accused entitled to acquittal under the principle that guilt must be proven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts