State through Murud Police Station vs Sairaj Nathuram Mali — 41/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 79,351(2),352. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG120003032025

Case disposed

Filing Number

271/2025

Filing Date

11-09-2025

Registration No

41/2025

Registration Date

11-09-2025

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Murud

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

62

Police Station

Murud Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 79,351(2),352

Petitioner(s)

State through Murud Police Station

Adv. Naik S. Y.

Respondent(s)

Sairaj Nathuram Mali

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud

12-03-2026

Disposed

12-02-2026

Arguments

08-01-2026

Evidence

10-12-2025

Evidence

10-11-2025

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary: Case 41/2025 - State v. Sairaj Nathuram Mali The Murud First Class Magistrate Court acquitted accused Sairaj Nathuram Mali on March 12, 2026, finding that the prosecution failed to establish the charges under Indian Penal Code sections 79, 351(2), and 352 (criminal intimidation and insult). The sole complainant-witness testified that she received a threatening phone call in April 2025 and later discovered her photograph set as a WhatsApp display picture, but provided no concrete evidence of the accused's involvement, and the complainant subsequently recanted her allegations. The court found the prosecution's case lacked sufficient solid evidence and held the accused entitled to acquittal under the principle that guilt must be proven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Case 41/2025 - State v. Sairaj Nathuram Mali The Murud First Class Magistrate Court acquitted accused Sairaj Nathuram Mali on March 12, 2026, finding that the prosecution failed to establish the charges under Indian Penal Code sections 79, 351(2), and 352 (criminal intimidation and insult). The sole complainant-witness testified that she received a threatening phone call in April 2025 and later discovered her photograph set as a WhatsApp display picture, but provided no concrete evidence of the accused's involvement, and the complainant subsequently recanted her allegations. The court found the prosecution's case lacked sufficient solid evidence and held the accused entitled to acquittal under the principle that guilt must be proven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Murud All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case