State Through State Excise Department Flying Squad No.1 Alibag vs Vaishali Mahesh Waghamare — 219/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65-e. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 10th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG120002912024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

264/2024

Filing Date

26-06-2024

Registration No

219/2024

Registration Date

26-06-2024

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Murud

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE

FIR Details

FIR Number

50

Police Station

State Excise Department, Flying Squad, Alibag

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65-e

Petitioner(s)

State Through State Excise Department Flying Squad No.1 Alibag

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Vaishali Mahesh Waghamare

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud

10-03-2026

Disposed

17-02-2026

Awaiting Summons

15-12-2025

Awaiting Summons

04-11-2025

Awaiting Summons

12-09-2025

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court stopped proceedings against Vaishali Mahesh Waghamare under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code for an alleged violation of Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, as the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons and no Complaint Report was filed. The accused is discharged, and the seized property (Muddemal) will be forwarded to the State Excise Department for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped proceedings against Vaishali Mahesh Waghamare under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code for an alleged violation of Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, as the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons and no Complaint Report was filed. The accused is discharged, and the seized property (Muddemal) will be forwarded to the State Excise Department for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Murud All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case