Sachin Sitaram Khedekar vs Sunil Pandurang Kambale Advocate - Patil D.N. — 25/2017

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37. Status: Awaiting Report of Commissioner. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHRG120002672017

Awaiting Report of Commissioner

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

Filing Number

42/2017

Filing Date

22-08-2017

Registration No

25/2017

Registration Date

22-08-2017

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Murud

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 37
IA/1/2025 Classification : Commission Request Section Sachin Sitaram KhedekarSunil Pandurang Kambale

Petitioner(s)

Sachin Sitaram Khedekar

Adv. विद्या रविंद्र देऊळकर

Respondent(s)

Sunil Pandurang Kambale Advocate - Patil D.N.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud

16-04-2026

Awaiting Report of Commissioner

12-03-2026

Awaiting Report of Commissioner

23-01-2026

Awaiting Report of Commissioner

24-12-2025

Awaiting Report of Commissioner

01-12-2025

Steps

Interim Orders

05-11-2022
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 25/2017 The court ordered the petitioner (Sachin Sitaram Khedekar) to pay Rs. 500/- to the respondent (Sunil Pandurang Kambale Advocate - Patil D.N.) as costs for the delay caused by the petitioner's failure to implead necessary parties in the suit. The petitioner was directed to file a corrected plaint within 14 days of the order, properly impleading the required defendants, after which the case would be transferred to the appropriate court for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 25/2017 The court ordered the petitioner (Sachin Sitaram Khedekar) to pay Rs. 500/- to the respondent (Sunil Pandurang Kambale Advocate - Patil D.N.) as costs for the delay caused by the petitioner's failure to implead necessary parties in the suit. The petitioner was directed to file a corrected plaint within 14 days of the order, properly impleading the required defendants, after which the case would be transferred to the appropriate court for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Murud All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case