State Through Excise Department Flying Squad No.1 Alibag vs Raghunath Vithya Waghmare — 181/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65-e. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG120002622025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
235/2025
Filing Date
29-07-2025
Registration No
181/2025
Registration Date
29-07-2025
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Murud
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
105
Police Station
State Excise Department, Flying Squad, Alibag
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Through Excise Department Flying Squad No.1 Alibag
Adv. Naik S. Y.
Respondent(s)
Raghunath Vithya Waghmare
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud
Disposed
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 21-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 17-12-2025 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 18-11-2025 | Evidence | |
| 14-10-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Murud acquitted defendant Raghunath Vithya Waghmmare of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E), for allegedly possessing 20 liters of illegal country liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to provide chemical analysis reports of the seized liquor and could not establish reliable evidence through independent witnesses, making it impossible to prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt. The court ordered the seized alcohol to be handed over to the State Excise Department after the custody period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Murud acquitted defendant Raghunath Vithya Waghmmare of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E), for allegedly possessing 20 liters of illegal country liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to provide chemical analysis reports of the seized liquor and could not establish reliable evidence through independent witnesses, making it impossible to prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt. The court ordered the seized alcohol to be handed over to the State Excise Department after the custody period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts