State of Maharashtra vs Salim P. Govani Advocate - Joshi S.G. — 32/2021
Case under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act,1966 Section 52,53,54,55. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG120001482021
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
118/2021
Filing Date
24-03-2021
Registration No
32/2021
Registration Date
24-03-2021
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Murud
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A P P
Respondent(s)
Salim P. Govani Advocate - Joshi S.G.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud
Evidence
Evidence
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Charge
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 29-12-2025 | Charge |
| 01-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.C./32/2021 The court rejected the accused Salim P. Govani's application for discharge under Section 239 CrPC. The accused was charged with unauthorized construction of an 84 sq. meter house on property within 120 meters of the sea line in violation of Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 and Environment Protection Act, 1986. The court found sufficient prima facie material in the FIR, panchanama, and witness statements to proceed against the accused, rejecting his contentions regarding lack of evidence and improper authority to file the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.C./32/2021 The court rejected the accused Salim P. Govani's application for discharge under Section 239 CrPC. The accused was charged with unauthorized construction of an 84 sq. meter house on property within 120 meters of the sea line in violation of Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 and Environment Protection Act, 1986. The court found sufficient prima facie material in the FIR, panchanama, and witness statements to proceed against the accused, rejecting his contentions regarding lack of evidence and improper authority to file the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts