State through Murud Police Station vs Rajaram Balaram Nandgaonkar — 76/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG120001112026

Filing Number

103/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

76/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Murud

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

8

Police Station

Murud Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State through Murud Police Station

    Adv. Naik S. Y.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajaram Balaram Nandgaonkar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: 76/2026 The First Class Judicial Magistrate at Murud convicted respondent Rajaram Balaram Nandgaonkar under Indian Penal Code Section 285 (negligent conduct with fire/combustible matter) for an incident occurring on 05-03-2026. The respondent pleaded guilty to the charge and admitted culpability. The court imposed a fine of ₹500 with an alternative sentence of one day's imprisonment, considering the respondent's impoverished circumstances and the minor nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 76/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 76/2026 The First Class Judicial Magistrate at Murud convicted respondent Rajaram Balaram Nandgaonkar under Indian Penal Code Section 285 (negligent conduct with fire/combustible matter) for an incident occurring on 05-03-2026. The respondent pleaded guilty to the charge and admitted culpability. The court imposed a fine of ₹500 with an alternative sentence of one day's imprisonment, considering the respondent's impoverished circumstances and the minor nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case