State through Revdanda Police Station vs Nitesh Balkrushna Rakshikar — 72/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG120001072026

Filing Number

99/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

72/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Murud

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

Revdanda Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

1.State through Revdanda Police Station

Adv. Naik S. Y.

Respondent(s)

1.Nitesh Balkrushna Rakshikar

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

Copy of JudgmentView PDF

The court convicted Nitesh Balkrushna Rakshikar under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code (2023) for negligently causing danger by leaving a vehicle (MH-06-BV-4631) in a dangerous condition on a road in Murud, Raygad district on February 20, 2026. The accused admitted guilt and the court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 500 with one day's imprisonment as an alternative, considering the offense as minor given his financial circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud
12-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
12-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 72/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Nitesh Balkrushna Rakshikar under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code (2023) for negligently causing danger by leaving a vehicle (MH-06-BV-4631) in a dangerous condition on a road in Murud, Raygad district on February 20, 2026. The accused admitted guilt and the court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 500 with one day's imprisonment as an alternative, considering the offense as minor given his financial circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.