Maharashtra State Through Inspector State Excise Flying Squad No.1 Alibag vs Naresh Suresh Waghmare — 53/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65-e. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 12th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG120000752024

Case disposed

Filing Number

64/2024

Filing Date

23-02-2024

Registration No

53/2024

Registration Date

23-02-2024

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Murud

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE

FIR Details

FIR Number

207

Police Station

State Excise Department, Flying Squad, Alibag

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65-e

Petitioner(s)

Maharashtra State Through Inspector State Excise Flying Squad No.1 Alibag

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Naresh Suresh Waghmare

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud

12-03-2026

Disposed

18-02-2026

Awaiting Warrant

03-01-2026

Awaiting Warrant

08-12-2025

Awaiting Warrant

16-10-2025

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court stopped proceedings against accused Naresh Suresh Waghmare under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code in this Maharashtra Prohibition Act case, citing the accused's prolonged absence despite repeated summons and the prosecution's failure to secure his presence or file a Complaint Affidavit report. The accused was discharged, and seized property (muddemal) was ordered forwarded to the State Excise Department for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped proceedings against accused Naresh Suresh Waghmare under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code in this Maharashtra Prohibition Act case, citing the accused's prolonged absence despite repeated summons and the prosecution's failure to secure his presence or file a Complaint Affidavit report. The accused was discharged, and seized property (muddemal) was ordered forwarded to the State Excise Department for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Murud All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case