State of Maharashtra vs Balaram Ram Koli Advocate - Jalgaonkar Saad M.Hanif — 599/2022
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 23rd March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG110013462022
Filing Number
1179/2022
Filing Date
24-Nov-2022
Registration No
599/2022
Registration Date
24-Nov-2022
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mangaon
Judge
2-Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
315
Police Station
Mangaon Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Balaram Ram Koli Advocate - Jalgaonkar Saad M.Hanif
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted accused Balaram Ram Koli of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E) for alleged illegal possession of liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and unreliable evidence, including lack of proper documentation of the seized materials, absence of the materials custodian's examination, and weak chemical analysis report documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
-
11-Mar-2026
Arguments
Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
-
09-Mar-2026
Arguments
Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
-
02-Mar-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
-
27-Jan-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
-
15-Jan-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
-
02-Jan-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
-
20-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
-
22-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
-
09-May-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon
-
28-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon
-
18-Feb-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon
-
17-Dec-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon
-
15-Oct-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon
-
19-Sep-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon
-
07-Aug-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon
-
09-Jul-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon
-
15-May-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon
-
15-Apr-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon
-
13-Mar-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon
-
08-Feb-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon
-
12-Jan-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon
-
28-Dec-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon
-
28-Nov-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon
-
03-Oct-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon
-
25-Aug-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon
-
06-Jul-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon
-
30-May-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon
-
10-May-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon
-
12-Apr-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon
-
10-Mar-2023
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon
-
11-Feb-2023
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon
-
12-Jan-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 599/2022
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted accused Balaram Ram Koli of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E) for alleged illegal possession of liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and unreliable evidence, including lack of proper documentation of the seized materials, absence of the materials custodian's examination, and weak chemical analysis report documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts