State of Maharashtra vs Balaram Ram Koli Advocate - Jalgaonkar Saad M.Hanif — 599/2022

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 23rd March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG110013462022

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1179/2022

Filing Date

24-11-2022

Registration No

599/2022

Registration Date

24-11-2022

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mangaon

Judge

2-Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

315

Police Station

Mangaon Police Station

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Balaram Ram Koli Advocate - Jalgaonkar Saad M.Hanif

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon

23-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Arguments

09-03-2026

Arguments

02-03-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

27-01-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Decision Summary The court acquitted accused Balaram Ram Koli of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E) for alleged illegal possession of liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and unreliable evidence, including lack of proper documentation of the seized materials, absence of the materials custodian's examination, and weak chemical analysis report documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court acquitted accused Balaram Ram Koli of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E) for alleged illegal possession of liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and unreliable evidence, including lack of proper documentation of the seized materials, absence of the materials custodian's examination, and weak chemical analysis report documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mangaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case